The course is part of the main area of study media technology and can be included in the degree requirements for a Degree of Master of Science in Media Technology (120 credits).
In this course students develop theoretical and practical knowledge of research methodologies in media technology.
The course focuses on qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods and research design approaches. Other course themes include philosophy of science and research ethics.
Knowledge and understanding
By the end of the course students should be able to:
- describe research methodologies and their uses in media technology,
- distinguish between different research paradigms.
Competence and abilities
By the end of the course students should be able to:
- apply appropriate research methodologies, methods and techniques relevant to media technology,
- apply the conventions of academic writing.
Evaluation abilities and approach
By the end of the course students should be able to:
- discuss and evaluate research and research-related issues within the field of media technology,
- argue for alternative ways of solving scientific problems, taking into account social and ethical aspects,
- identify and critically discuss methodological problems from an interdisciplinary and multi-methodological perspective,
- critically review research articles with respect to review of the literature, method and research design.
The course consists of lectures, seminars, workshops and independent study.
Grading is based on oral and written examination, including active participation in seminars.
The course is assessed based on the following:
- Written Examination (3 credits, UA)
- Seminars (2.5 credits, UG)
- Written assignments (2 credits, UA)
To pass the course (A-E): At least grade E on written examination (3 credits) and written assignments (2 credits) and grade G on seminar participation is required. Course grade is calculated based on the weighted average of assessed parts.
- Cresswell, J. W. & Cresswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5 ed.). London: Sage.
- O’Reilly, K. (2012). Ethnographic methods (2 ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
- Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. London: Sage.
There will be additional readings.
The University provides students who are taking or have completed a course with the opportunity to share their experiences of and opinions about the course in the form of a course evaluation that is arranged by the University. The University compiles the course evaluations and notifies the results and any decisions regarding actions brought about by the course evaluations. The results shall be kept available for the students. (HF 1:14).
When a course is no longer given, or the contents have been radically changed, the student has the right to re-take the examination, which will be given twice during a one year period, according to the syllabus which was valid at the time of registration.
The syllabus is a translation of a Swedish source text.