Master's level
Entry requirements
General entry requirements: First-cycle qualification comprising at least 180 credits.
Specific entry requirements:
At least three years of documented experience of teaching at higher education level, or working with skills development in at an equivalent organisation (for example, Swedish Customs, the Swedish Police Authority, Swedish Armed Forces) or successful completion of courses comprising at least 60 credits in one of the following subjects: Education pedagogy, educational sciences, work with teaching and education or other subject in the behavioural sciences, in addition to English 6.
LAHPE / Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
A1N / Second cycle, has only first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
A1N
The course aims for students to deepen their knowledge in scientific theory, the research process, and their knowledge of teaching and learning in higher education and adult learning as research areas. The course includes practical elements in which the student explores the practice of teaching and learning in higher education.
The course reviews national and international research in teaching and learning in higher education and adult learning, in addition to the critical issues that arise in connection with the studies’ backgrounds and research processes.
Upon completion of the course, the student will
- Evaluate and problematise research of teaching and learning in higher education and adult learning from the perspective of scientific theory,
- Identify and present central concepts and theoretical perspectives in research of teaching and learning in higher education,
- analyse and present the various aspects of research processes,
- Compare Swedish and international legislation governing higher education, with focus on adult learning and teaching and learning in higher education.
Seminars are linked to lectures; group work and individual presentations using different media. There will be opportunities for feedback between the students throughout the course. Methods will be developed based on the purpose and intended learning outcomes of the course, in a collaboration between students and teachers.
Examination 1: Analysis of article 4.5 credits.
This examination assesses intended learning outcomes 1, 2 and 3.
The student presents an academic article in the field of teaching and learning in higher education, with their analysis based on scientific theory and methodology. The presentation includes central concepts and theoretical perspectives. Different aspects of the research process will be discussed based on the analysis. The analysis will be presented during a seminar, or as an audio recording.
Examination 2: Individual paper, 3 credits.
This examination assesses intended learning outcome 4. The paper includes a comparison of Swedish and international legislation governing higher education, with focus on adult learning and teaching and learning in higher education.
Alternative assessment forms may be included following consultation with the examiner.
The course coordinator will provide information about grading criteria at the start of the course.
It must be possible to distinguish between individual performances for
all assessments
Boyer, Ernest L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Cleaver, E., Lintern, M. and McLinden, M. (2018). Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Disciplinary Approaches to Educational Enquiry.2nd. London: Sage. ISBN 9781526409591 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/37840
Fejes, Andreas & Nylander, Erik. (2019). Mapping out the research field of adult education and learning. Springer.
Kreber, C. (2002) Teaching excellence, teaching expertise, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education, 2 (1) 5-25.
MacFarlane, B. (2012) POINTS FOR DEBATE. The higher education research archipelago. Hig- her Education Research & Development. Vol. 31, No. 1, February 2012, 129–131.
Additional literature to be chosen in consultation with the course coordinator.
Additional literature may be added.
Malmö University provides students who participate in, or who have completed a course, with the opportunity to express their opinions and describe their experiences of the course by completing a course evaluation administered by the University. The University will compile and summarise the results of course evaluations. The University will also inform participants of the results and any decisions relating to measures taken in response to the course evaluations. The results will be made available to the students (HF 1:14).
If a course is no longer offered, or has undergone significant changes, the students must be offered two opportunities for re-examination based on the syllabus that applied at the time of registration, for a period of one year after the changes have been implemented.
If a student has a Learning support decision, the examiner has the right to provide the student with an adapted test, or to allow the student to take the exam in a different format. The syllabus is a translation of a Swedish source text.